Visual Interactive Virtual Object: Development of Whisk AI Based Animated Video Media to Improve Science Learning Outcomes

Gingga Prananda, Mariane Bitacura Tubo, Eka Supriatna, Loso Judijanto

Abstract


The rapid development of digital technology in education requires innovative learning media that can help elementary students understand abstract science concepts more effectively. However, many elementary science learning practices still rely on conventional explanations that limit students’ conceptual visualization and interactive engagement. This gap indicates the need for technology-integrated media that combine visual representation and interactive learning experiences. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and examine the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of WHISK AI–based animated video learning media integrating the VIVO (Visual Interactive Virtual Object) concept in elementary science learning. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of artificial intelligence assisted animated video development with interactive virtual object visualization (VIVO), which has not been widely implemented in elementary science learning to support the visualization of abstract concepts through visual interactive scaffolding. This study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model, which consists of five stages: analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The research subjects were fifth-grade students from SDN 06 KL and SDN 13 LB in West Sumatra during the second semester of the academic year. Data were collected through expert validation sheets, teacher practicality questionnaires, student response questionnaires, observations, and learning outcome tests using a one-group pretest–posttest design. Data analysis techniques included descriptive quantitative analysis using mean scores to determine validity and practicality levels, as well as normalized gain (N-gain) analysis to measure learning effectiveness. The validation results from six experts (language, content, and educational technology experts) showed an average score of 4.32, categorized as highly valid. The practicality test involving six teachers produced an average score of 4.40, indicating that the media are highly practical. Furthermore, the effectiveness test conducted with 80 students demonstrated a moderate improvement in learning outcomes, with an average N-gain score of 0.57, indicating meaningful conceptual improvement after the implementation of the developed media. Based on these findings, the WHISK AI–based animated video learning media integrating the VIVO concept are valid, practical, and effective in improving students’ understanding of abstract science concepts. Pedagogically, the integration of AI-generated animation and interactive virtual visualization provides structured visual scaffolding that supports conceptual construction, increases student engagement, and strengthens technology-integrated science learning at the elementary level. Therefore, this media can serve as an innovative alternative to enhance digital-based instructional practices in elementary science education.

Keywords


Science Learning; Elementary School; Animated Video; VIVO; WHISK AI.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References


Afrilyasanti, R., Basthomi, Y., & Zen, E. L. (2023). EFL students ’ participations and teachers ’ roles in online discussion forum for critical media literacy learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), 414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12965

Akavova, A., Temirkhanova, Z., & Lorsanova, Z. (2023). Adaptive learning and artificial intelligence in the educational space. E3S Web of Conferences, 451(4), 6011. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345106011

Al Hashimi, S. A., Al Muwali, A. A., Zaki, Y. E., & Mahdi, N. A. (2019). The Effectiveness of Social Media and Multimedia-Based Pedagogy in Enhancing Creativity among Art , Design , and Digital Media Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i21.10596

Albion, P. R., & Gibson, I. W. (2000). Problem-based learning as a multimedia design framework in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.5555/372850.372855

Ardiansyah, R., & Joyoatmojo, S. (2025). Optimizing Science Concept Learning : The Challenge of Computational Thinking Skills Integration. Educational Process: International Journal, 16, 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.16.206

Aslan, S., Alanoğlu, M., & Karabatak, S. (2025). Enhancing 21st-century teaching competencies: The key role of digital literacy in connecting pre-service teachers’ TPACK. Information Development, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251315841

Barut Tugtekin, E., & Dursun, O. O. (2022). (2022). Effect of animated and interactive video variations on learners’ motivation in distance education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3247–3276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10735-5

Bootchuy, P., Amornrit, P., & Tantaphalin, P. (2025). The readiness survey of students in using artificial intelligence for distance education in higher education. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(5), 273–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v14n5p273

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. In Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Cakiroglu, U., & Yilmaz, H. (2017). Using Videos and 3D Animations for Conceptual Learning in Basic Computer Units. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(4), 390– 405. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6207

Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., & Tseng, J. S. (2011). Is single or dual channel with different English proficiencies better for English listening comprehension, cognitive load and attitude in ubiquitous learning environment?. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2313-2321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.006

Dilekçi, A., & Karatay, H. (2023). The effects of the 21st century skills curriculum on the development of students’ creative thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47(1), 101229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101229

Faruk, U. R., Faruku, A., & Hassan, L. Z. (2022). Assessing Effectiveness of Animated Instructional Media on Academic Performance and Retention of Genetics Concepts. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 5(1), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v5i1.16949

Fitria, R. (2024). Trends in Research on Representation in Chemistry Learning : A Systematic Review. Anatolian Journal of Education, 9(2), 65–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2024.926a

Friska, S. Y., Amanda, M. T., Novitasari, A., & Prananda, G. (2022). Pengaruh Video Animasi terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Muatan Pembelajaran IPA Kelas IV di SD Negeri 08 Sungai Rumbai. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(1), 250–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.1.250-255

Guo, D., Zhao, Y., Sun, Q., & Ramos, R. L. M. (2025). Design of interactive spaces for promoting parental involvement: Strategies used by EFL teachers. Online Learning, 29(2), 140– 167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i2.4683

Haastrecht, M. Van, Haas, M., Brinkhuis, M., & Spruit, M. (2024). Computers & Education Understanding validity criteria in technology-enhanced learning : A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 220(3), 105128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105128

Herder, T., & Rau, M. A. (2022). Representational-competency supports in the context of an educational video game for undergraduate astronomy. Computers & Education, 190(2), 104602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104602

Huang, R., Liu, D., Kanwar, A. S., Zhan, T., Yang, J., Zhuang, R., ... & Adarkwah, M. A. (2024). Global understanding of smart education in the context of digital transformation. Open Praxis, 16(4), 663–676. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.761

Jannah, M., Izati, W., Aprilia, D., & Nurjanah, S. (2024). The Effect of Technology-Based Learning Media : Increasing Student Interest in Learning in the Digital Age. International Journal of Islamic Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 63–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.69637/ijiting.v1i2.76

Joseph, O. B., Onwuzulike, O. C., & Shitu, K. (2024). (2024). Digital transformation in education: Strategies for effective implementation. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(2), 2785–2799. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.2.2668

Junjun, J., & Pillai, M. D. (2024). A Research to Evaluate the Reliability Problems in Animation. Cuestiones de Fisioterapia, 53(3), 4879–4887. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48047/r6emzc70

Kale, U., Roy, A., & Yuan, J. (2020). To design or to integrate? Instructional design versus technology integration in developing learning interventions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2473-2504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09771-8

Maraisane, M. J. L., Jita, L. C., Jita, T., State, F., Africa, S., & Africa, S. (2021). The notions of floating and sinking : Exploring the conceptual knowledge of Grade R teachers. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4102/ sajce.v14i1.1407

Maryland, P. and R. of the E. C. C. and E. W. in. (2016). Preparation and Retention of the Early Childhood Care and Education Workforce in Maryland. MD: Maryland Longitudinal Data System Center, 13(1). https://doi.org/Accessed February 8, 2024, from https://marylandexcels.org/”

Ningtyas, P. K., Widarti, H. R., & Parlan, P. (2024). Exploring the Use of Social Media in Science Learning Environments : A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Science Learning, 7(1), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v7i2.67071

Nurhasanah, A. (2025). Digital-Based Learning Media Innovation : Improving Motivation and Science Learning Outcomes To cite this article : Digital-Based Learning Media Innovation : Improving Motivation and Science Learning Outcomes. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES), 7(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.723

Nussli, N., & Oh, K. (2025). Applying the POUR Model to Enhance Digital Accessibility in HyFlex Learning Environments. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 51(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28636

Osman, N. S., Fauzi, A., Ayub, M., Zulkifli, N. N., & Mahat, J. (2025). Development of an Augmented Reality-Based Learning Module on Isometric Transformation for Form 2 Students in Malaysia. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 17(3), 42–69. https://doi.org/https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1482018

Oxley, A. (2025). From chalkboards to chatbots: Why education must play a role in AI’s creation. International Journal of the Whole Child, 10(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/https://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/ijwc/article/view/2637

Özcan, M. F., & Kiliç, L. K. (2017). The effects of animation supported 5E model on teaching ‘indicative and subjunctive moods’ in 7th grade Turkish lesson. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(12), 51407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051407

Pamelasari, S. D., Wusqo, I. U., Hardianti, R. D., Semarang, U. N., & Java, C. (2024). Developing Science Instruction in English Audiobook to Train Indonesian Prospective Science Teachers ’ Teaching Skills 1. MEXTESOL Journal, 48(2), 0–2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v48n2-10

Pem, K., & Sukavatee, P. (2024). Bhutanese Fourth Grade Students ’ Opinions towards Extensive Reading. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70730/ZLGR9364

Peng, J., & Li, Y. (2025). Frontiers of artificial intelligence for personalized learning in higher education: A systematic review of leading articles. Applied Sciences, 15(8), 10096. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810096

Raklaemthong, T., Bunchau, P., Dathpong, W., & Thongdee, P. (2025). Needs of Thai Diorama Documentary Production for Learning. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(3), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v14n3p306

Ramaila, S., & Molwele, A. J. (2022). The Role of Technology Integration in the Development of 21 st Century Skills and Competencies in Life Sciences Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(5), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v11n5p9

Ramdhani, S., Nurcahyono, N. A., & Dewi, S. (2025). Designing Interactive E-Modules Based on Differentiated Instruction and the Theory of Didactical Situations for Primary Mathematics Education. Educational Process: International Journal, 17(1), e2025368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.17.368

Ramendra, D. P., Juniarta, P. A. K., Parma, I. P. G., Jayanta, I. N. L., Tantri, A. A. S., & Dewantara, K. A. K. (2025). Artificial intelligence-based virtual tour for vocational high schools in tourism sector in developing English language competence for guides. International Journal of Language Education, 9(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v1i1.71704

Roozafzai, Z. S., & Zaeri, P. (2025). Enhancing comprehension of earth science concepts through digital animation and inclusive discourse. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55020/iojpe.1570986

Rosdiana, L., & Ulya, R. M. (2021). The effectiveness of the animation video learning earth’s layer media to improve students’ concept understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2899(1), 12172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1899/1/012172

Rubenstein, E. D., Scott, J. D., Dove, C. R., & Pringle, T. D. (2023). Does Experiential Learning Improve Student Performance in an Introductory Animal Science. NACTA Journal, 67(1), 201–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.125

Sajja, R., Sermet, Y., Cikmaz, M., Cwiertny, D., & Demir, I. (2024). Artificial intelligence- enabled intelligent assistant for personalized and adaptive learning in higher education. MDPI, 15(10), 15100596. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/info15100596

Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2005). Enabling, facilitating, and inhibiting effects of animations in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 47–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504797

Siregar, S. W., Sunendar, D., Nanola, N., & B. (2024). Analysis of the utilization of technology-based learning media in elementary school students’ listening skills: A systematic literature review. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 11(4), 788–806. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v11i4.78885

Thelma, C. C., Sain, Z. H., Mpolomoka, D. L., Akpan, W. M., & Davy, M. (2024). Curriculum design for the digital age: Strategies for effective technology integration in higher education. International Journal of Research, 11(7), 185–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09771-8

Tippett, C. D. (2016). What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 725-746. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1158435

Yeh, Y. (2016). An Investigation of Human-Computer Interaction Approaches Beneficial to Weak Learners in Complex Animation Learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6166

Yuksel, I., & Eker, M. (2021). The Views of Pre-Service Science Teachers on the History of Science After Taking the Course of the Course of Nature and History of Science : A Profile from Turkey. International Education Studies, 14(4), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n4p72

Zhang, W. (2022). The role of technology-based education and teacher professional development in English as a foreign language classes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910315




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v9i1.38227

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Gingga Prananda, Mariane Bitacura Tubo, Eka Supriatna, Loso Judijanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application) already indexed:

            

___________________________________________________________________

  
   https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.

   Creative Commons License
   IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application)
   is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 View IJECA Stats

____________________________________________________________________

 IJECA Publisher Office: